Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2003) 125 509-517
DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1250509
Copyright © 2003 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fazeli, A
Right arrow Articles by Holt, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fazeli, A
Right arrow Articles by Holt, W.

Articles

In vitro maintenance of boar sperm viability by a soluble fraction obtained from oviductal apical plasma membrane preparations

A Fazeli, RM Elliott, AE Duncan, A Moore, PF Watson, and WV Holt

Oviductal apical plasma membrane fractions have been successfully used to provide an in vitro model to study the role of direct membrane contact in sperm-oviduct interactions. Apical plasma membrane preparations from pig oviductal tissues show a dose-response in their ability to maintain boar sperm viability in vitro. Membrane preparations obtained from other tissues (lung and duodenum) are incapable of maintaining boar sperm viability to the same extent as oviductal tissue. The present study examined the validity of two hypotheses that arise from current knowledge of sperm-oviduct interactions, namely, that (i) apical plasma membranes prepared from ampullar regions of the oviduct are less effective than those from isthmus regions, and (ii) sperm survival is more effective in apical plasma membrane preparations derived from follicular phase oviducts than those derived from luteal phase oviducts. Both hypotheses were proved false. The nature of the active component(s) in the oviductal apical plasma membrane fractions was further investigated. Heat treatment (100 degrees C for 20 min) diminished the capacity of membranes to support boar sperm viability. Furthermore, a soluble salt-extracted fraction obtained from oviductal apical plasma membrane preparations was biologically active and supported boar sperm viability in vitro. This may indicate that the active factor(s) responsible for the maintenance of boar sperm viability is not an integral part of oviductal membranes and is peripherally bound to these membranes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
N. S. Prathalingam, P. F. Watson, S. G. Revell, J. Busby, and W. V. Holt
The Response of Bovine Spermatozoa to Bicarbonate and Its Use to Assess the Influence of Added Oviductal Epithelial Proteins on Cryopreservation
J Androl, May 1, 2007; 28(3): 407 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
N. Satake, R. M. A. Elliott, P. F. Watson, and W. V. Holt
Sperm selection and competition in pigs may be mediated by the differential motility activation and suppression of sperm subpopulations within the oviduct
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2006; 209(8): 1560 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
A. S. Georgiou, E. Sostaric, C. H. Wong, A. P. L. Snijders, P. C. Wright, H. D. Moore, and A. Fazeli
Gametes Alter the Oviductal Secretory Proteome
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2005; 4(11): 1785 - 1796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Ekhlasi-Hundrieser, K. Gohr, A. Wagner, M. Tsolova, A. Petrunkina, and E. Topfer-Petersen
Spermadhesin AQN1 Is a Candidate Receptor Molecule Involved in the Formation of the Oviductal Sperm Reservoir in the Pig
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2005; 73(3): 536 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Fazeli, N. A. Affara, M. Hubank, and W. V. Holt
Sperm-Induced Modification of the Oviductal Gene Expression Profile After Natural Insemination in Mice
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 60 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.