Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2002) 123 445-453
DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1230445
Copyright © 2002 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Fowden, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Fowden, A.

Articles

Influence of maternal size on placental, fetal and postnatal growth in the horse. I. Development in utero

WR Allen, S Wilsher, C Turnbull, F Stewart, J Ousey, PD Rossdale, and AL Fowden

The interacting influences of maternal size and fetal genotype on placental and fetal development in the mare were assessed by comparing conventional within-breed Thoroughbred (Tb-in-Tb, n = 7) and Pony (P-in-P, n = 7) control pregnancies established by artificial insemination (AI) with between-breed (Tb-in-P, n = 8; deprived in utero condition and P-in-Tb, n = 7; luxurious in utero condition) experimental pregnancies established by embryo transfer. All foals were born spontaneously and the mean (+/- SEM) duration of gestation in the two groups of control mares was significantly different (P < 0.001) at 325 +/- 3.0 days for the P-in-P pregnancies and 339 +/- 3.0 days for the Tb-in-Tb pregnancies, whereas the durations of gestation for the two experimental groups were very similar and midway between those of the control pregnancies at 332 +/- 2.8 days for the Tb-in-P and 331 +/- 2.7 days for the P-in-Tb. Mean (+/- SEM) foal birth weight and the mean (+/- SEM) values for the mass, gross area and volume of the allantochorion were all highest in the seven Tb-in-Tb pregnancies (53.1 +/- 2.6 kg, 3.8 +/- 0.3 kg, 12.9 +/- 0.3 x 10(3) cm(2), 3.5 +/- 0.2 l, respectively) and lowest in the seven P-in-P control pregnancies (24.0 +/- 1.3 kg, 1.7 +/- 0.1 kg, 8.3 +/- 0.3 x 10(3) cm(2), 1.8 +/- 0.1 l, respectively). These parameters were higher in the seven P-in-Tb pregnancies (37.9 +/- 2.1 kg, 2.7 +/- 0.1 kg, 10.1 +/- 0.5 x 10(3) cm(2), 2.5 +/- 0.1 l, respectively) than in the eight Tb-in-P (33.0 +/- 2.4 kg, 2.3 +/- 0.2 kg, 9.0 +/- 0.5 x 10(3) cm(2), 2.1 +/- 0.1 l) experimental pregnancies. Foal birth weight was positively correlated with the mass (r = 0.84, P < 0.001), gross area (r = 0.87, P < 0.001) and volume (r = 0.91, P < 0.001) of the allantochorion, and maternal weight was also positively correlated with both the mass and gross area of the allantochorion (r = 0.64 and 0.69, respectively; both P < 0.001). Application of stereology to multiple random biopsies recovered from each placenta produced mean values for the surface density of microcotyledons on the allantochorion (S(v)). Values were higher in Thoroughbred than in Pony mares regardless of the breed of fetus being carried. Multiplication of S(v) by the volume of the allantochorion to give the total microscopic area of fetomaternal contact at the placental interface was also positively correlated with foal birth weight (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Foal birth weight was determined by the microscopic area of fetomaternal contact of the placenta and there were no differences in foal weight per m(2) of placenta regardless of fetal or maternal genomes. Thus, the results indicate that in equids, maternal size interacts with both the maternal and fetal genotypes to control the rate and extent of fetal growth by influencing the gross area of the diffuse allantochorion, and the density, complexity and depth of the microcotyledons on its surface.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. M. Coan, E. Angiolini, I. Sandovici, G. J. Burton, M. Constancia, and A. L. Fowden
Adaptations in placental nutrient transfer capacity to meet fetal growth demands depend on placental size in mice
J. Physiol., September 15, 2008; 586(18): 4567 - 4576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. A Hanson and K. M Godfrey
Commentary: Maternal constraint is a pre-eminent regulator of fetal growth
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 252 - 254.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. A Leon
Commentary: The development of the Ounsteds' theory of maternal constraint--a critical perspective
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 255 - 259.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. Wu, F. W. Bazer, J. M. Wallace, and T. E. Spencer
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Intrauterine growth retardation: Implications for the animal sciences
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2316 - 2337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
W R Allen, S. Wilsher, C. Tiplady, and R M Butterfield
The influence of maternal size on pre- and postnatal growth in the horse: III Postnatal growth
Reproduction, January 1, 2004; 127(1): 67 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2002 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.