| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Articles |
Cloning methods are now well described and in almost routine use. However, the frequencies of production of live offspring from activated oocytes remain at < 3% and little is known about the factors that affect these frequencies. The effects of cytokinesis inhibitors, dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) and the cell cycle of recipient cytoplasm on the cloning of mice were examined. Reconstructed oocytes, which were activated immediately after nucleus injection and cultured without cytochalasin B, developed into blastocysts at a frequency of 30--54% and into live cloned offspring at a frequency of 2--3%. Activated zygotes did not support development to full term after nuclear transfer. Reconstructed oocytes were activated 1--3 h after nuclear transfer and were exposed separately to three inhibitors of cytokinesis (cytochalasin B, cytochalasin D or nocodazole) to examine the toxicity of these inhibitors on cloning. All of the oocytes exposed to nocodazole-containing media formed many small pseudo-pronuclei, whereas with cytochalasin-containing media most of the activated oocytes formed only two pseudo-pronuclei. Despite such differences, 42--61% of reconstructed embryos developed to the morula-blastocyst stage and 1--3% developed to full term in all groups. Addition of 1% (v/v) DMSO to the activation medium significantly improved the frequency of development to the blastocyst stage and full term; however, this improvement did not lead to a higher success rate in the generation of live cloned offspring. These results show that activated mouse oocytes/zygotes are not effective cytoplasmic recipients with the methods described and that the lack of success of cloning is not due to inhibition of cytokinesis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Hikichi, S. Wakayama, E. Mizutani, Y. Takashima, S. Kishigami, N. Van Thuan, H. Ohta, H. Thuy Bui, S.-I. Nishikawa, and T. Wakayama Differentiation Potential of Parthenogenetic Embryonic Stem Cells Is Improved by Nuclear Transfer Stem Cells, January 1, 2007; 25(1): 46 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Mizutani, H. Ohta, S. Kishigami, N. Van Thuan, T. Hikichi, S. Wakayama, M. Kosaka, E. Sato, and T. Wakayama Developmental ability of cloned embryos from neural stem cells. Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 849 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iwatani, K. Ikegami, Y. Kremenska, N. Hattori, S. Tanaka, S. Yagi, and K. Shiota Dimethyl Sulfoxide Has an Impact on Epigenetic Profile in Mouse Embryoid Body Stem Cells, November 1, 2006; 24(11): 2549 - 2556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-T. Bui, N. Van Thuan, T. Wakayama, and T. Miyano Chromatin remodeling in somatic cells injected into mature pig oocytes. Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1037 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rybouchkin, Y. Kato, and Y. Tsunoda Role of Histone Acetylation in Reprogramming of Somatic Nuclei Following Nuclear Transfer Biol Reprod, June 1, 2006; 74(6): 1083 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Van Thuan, S. Wakayama, S. Kishigami, H. Ohta, T. Hikichi, E. Mizutani, H.-T. Bui, and T. Wakayama Injection of Somatic Cell Cytoplasm into Oocytes Before Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Impairs Full-Term Development and Increases Placental Weight in Mice Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 865 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boiani, L. Gentile, V. V. Gambles, F. Cavaleri, C. A. Redi, and H. R. Scholer Variable Reprogramming of the Pluripotent Stem Cell Marker Oct4 in Mouse Clones: Distinct Developmental Potentials in Different Culture Environments Stem Cells, September 1, 2005; 23(8): 1089 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ito, M. Hirabayashi, M. Kato, A. Takeuchi, M. Ito, M. Shimada, and S. Hochi Contribution of high p34cdc2 kinase activity to premature chromosome condensation of injected somatic cell nuclei in rat oocytes Reproduction, February 1, 2005; 129(2): 171 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Miki, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, K. Mochida, H. Nagashima, T. Baba, and A. Ogura Cytoplasmic Asters Are Required for Progression Past the First Cell Cycle in Cloned Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 2022 - 2028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C St John, R. E I Lloyd, E. J Bowles, E. C Thomas, and S. El Shourbagy The consequences of nuclear transfer for mammalian foetal development and offspring survival. A mitochondrial DNA perspective Reproduction, June 1, 2004; 127(6): 631 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Mullins, I. Wilmut, and J. J. Mullins Nuclear transfer in rodents J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 4 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Choi, L. B. Love, M. E. Westhusin, and K. Hinrichs Activation of Equine Nuclear Transfer Oocytes: Methods and Timing of Treatment in Relation to Nuclear Remodeling Biol Reprod, January 1, 2004; 70(1): 46 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. G. Chung, S. Ratnam, J. R. Chaillet, and K. E. Latham Abnormal Regulation of DNA Methyltransferase Expression in Cloned Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 146 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tesarik Reproductive semi-cloning respecting biparental embryo origin: Embryos from syngamy between a gamete and a haploidized somatic cell Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1933 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.H. Choi, C.C. Love, Y.G. Chung, D.D. Varner, M.E. Westhusin, R.C. Burghardt, and K. Hinrichs Production of Nuclear Transfer Horse Embryos by Piezo-Driven Injection of Somatic Cell Nuclei and Activation with Stallion Sperm Cytosolic Extract Biol Reprod, August 1, 2002; 67(2): 561 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. G. Chung, M. R.W. Mann, M. S. Bartolomei, and K. E. Latham Nuclear-Cytoplasmic "Tug of War" During Cloning: Effects of Somatic Cell Nuclei on Culture Medium Preferences of Preimplantation Cloned Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1178 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |