Reproduction   citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Reproduction (2001) 122 49-60
DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1220049
Copyright © 2001 Society for Reproduction and Fertility
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wakayama, T
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wakayama, T
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R

Articles

Effect of cytokinesis inhibitors, DMSO and the timing of oocyte activation on mouse cloning using cumulus cell nuclei

T Wakayama and R Yanagimachi

Cloning methods are now well described and in almost routine use. However, the frequencies of production of live offspring from activated oocytes remain at < 3% and little is known about the factors that affect these frequencies. The effects of cytokinesis inhibitors, dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) and the cell cycle of recipient cytoplasm on the cloning of mice were examined. Reconstructed oocytes, which were activated immediately after nucleus injection and cultured without cytochalasin B, developed into blastocysts at a frequency of 30--54% and into live cloned offspring at a frequency of 2--3%. Activated zygotes did not support development to full term after nuclear transfer. Reconstructed oocytes were activated 1--3 h after nuclear transfer and were exposed separately to three inhibitors of cytokinesis (cytochalasin B, cytochalasin D or nocodazole) to examine the toxicity of these inhibitors on cloning. All of the oocytes exposed to nocodazole-containing media formed many small pseudo-pronuclei, whereas with cytochalasin-containing media most of the activated oocytes formed only two pseudo-pronuclei. Despite such differences, 42--61% of reconstructed embryos developed to the morula-blastocyst stage and 1--3% developed to full term in all groups. Addition of 1% (v/v) DMSO to the activation medium significantly improved the frequency of development to the blastocyst stage and full term; however, this improvement did not lead to a higher success rate in the generation of live cloned offspring. These results show that activated mouse oocytes/zygotes are not effective cytoplasmic recipients with the methods described and that the lack of success of cloning is not due to inhibition of cytokinesis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
T. Hikichi, S. Wakayama, E. Mizutani, Y. Takashima, S. Kishigami, N. Van Thuan, H. Ohta, H. Thuy Bui, S.-I. Nishikawa, and T. Wakayama
Differentiation Potential of Parthenogenetic Embryonic Stem Cells Is Improved by Nuclear Transfer
Stem Cells, January 1, 2007; 25(1): 46 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Mizutani, H. Ohta, S. Kishigami, N. Van Thuan, T. Hikichi, S. Wakayama, M. Kosaka, E. Sato, and T. Wakayama
Developmental ability of cloned embryos from neural stem cells.
Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 849 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
M. Iwatani, K. Ikegami, Y. Kremenska, N. Hattori, S. Tanaka, S. Yagi, and K. Shiota
Dimethyl Sulfoxide Has an Impact on Epigenetic Profile in Mouse Embryoid Body
Stem Cells, November 1, 2006; 24(11): 2549 - 2556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H.-T. Bui, N. Van Thuan, T. Wakayama, and T. Miyano
Chromatin remodeling in somatic cells injected into mature pig oocytes.
Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1037 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Rybouchkin, Y. Kato, and Y. Tsunoda
Role of Histone Acetylation in Reprogramming of Somatic Nuclei Following Nuclear Transfer
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2006; 74(6): 1083 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. Van Thuan, S. Wakayama, S. Kishigami, H. Ohta, T. Hikichi, E. Mizutani, H.-T. Bui, and T. Wakayama
Injection of Somatic Cell Cytoplasm into Oocytes Before Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Impairs Full-Term Development and Increases Placental Weight in Mice
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 865 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
M. Boiani, L. Gentile, V. V. Gambles, F. Cavaleri, C. A. Redi, and H. R. Scholer
Variable Reprogramming of the Pluripotent Stem Cell Marker Oct4 in Mouse Clones: Distinct Developmental Potentials in Different Culture Environments
Stem Cells, September 1, 2005; 23(8): 1089 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. Ito, M. Hirabayashi, M. Kato, A. Takeuchi, M. Ito, M. Shimada, and S. Hochi
Contribution of high p34cdc2 kinase activity to premature chromosome condensation of injected somatic cell nuclei in rat oocytes
Reproduction, February 1, 2005; 129(2): 171 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Miki, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, K. Mochida, H. Nagashima, T. Baba, and A. Ogura
Cytoplasmic Asters Are Required for Progression Past the First Cell Cycle in Cloned Mouse Embryos
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 2022 - 2028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. C St John, R. E I Lloyd, E. J Bowles, E. C Thomas, and S. El Shourbagy
The consequences of nuclear transfer for mammalian foetal development and offspring survival. A mitochondrial DNA perspective
Reproduction, June 1, 2004; 127(6): 631 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. J. Mullins, I. Wilmut, and J. J. Mullins
Nuclear transfer in rodents
J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 4 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y.-H. Choi, L. B. Love, M. E. Westhusin, and K. Hinrichs
Activation of Equine Nuclear Transfer Oocytes: Methods and Timing of Treatment in Relation to Nuclear Remodeling
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2004; 70(1): 46 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. G. Chung, S. Ratnam, J. R. Chaillet, and K. E. Latham
Abnormal Regulation of DNA Methyltransferase Expression in Cloned Mouse Embryos
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 146 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Tesarik
Reproductive semi-cloning respecting biparental embryo origin: Embryos from syngamy between a gamete and a haploidized somatic cell
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1933 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y.H. Choi, C.C. Love, Y.G. Chung, D.D. Varner, M.E. Westhusin, R.C. Burghardt, and K. Hinrichs
Production of Nuclear Transfer Horse Embryos by Piezo-Driven Injection of Somatic Cell Nuclei and Activation with Stallion Sperm Cytosolic Extract
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2002; 67(2): 561 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. G. Chung, M. R.W. Mann, M. S. Bartolomei, and K. E. Latham
Nuclear-Cytoplasmic "Tug of War" During Cloning: Effects of Somatic Cell Nuclei on Culture Medium Preferences of Preimplantation Cloned Mouse Embryos
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2002; 66(4): 1178 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS  
Copyright © 2001 by the Society for Reproduction and Fertility.